Recover why the hypothesis arose
Record which signals motivated it: for example, a declared capability, a public program, or a sector need. Review their provenance, dates, and subjects. Keep each item separate: a capability may support that an organization makes something, while a call for proposals may describe another entity's planned activity. Neither automatically establishes a purchase between them.
Check timing and current conditions
Check whether the initiative's deadline passed, the source remains valid, and the geographic, regulatory, technical, or capacity context changed. Do not assume a page available today confirms an open need. If evidence is old, preserve it as history and seek appropriate confirmation before using it to describe the present state.
Assess what is missing before answering
A commercial opportunity requires more than product compatibility: evidence of need, budget, purchasing criteria, supply capability, eligibility, or a relevant point of contact may be missing. Frame these gaps as questions and determine which can be checked using authorized sources. If the basis is insufficient, do not force a single score or turn missing context into low demand or rejection.
Choose a next step without changing its epistemic state
The review may justify another public-source search, an internal question, or abstaining from prioritization until context improves. A next step does not turn a hypothesis into an observed relationship. If new evidence confirms only part of the picture, such as an announced project, limit the description to that part and keep unsupported commercial details unknown.
Conceptual example
Hypothetical example: an energy-efficiency call from last year seemed compatible with an installation company's capability. The call is still visible, but its deadline passed. It can remain useful historical context while you look for a current initiative; it should not be shown as open demand or an assignment for that company.
Scope and limits
Currentness is not resolved by a recent date alone, and compatibility does not establish commercial fit. Public sources may not reveal private decisions, budgets, or conversations. Do not label a possibility a lead, customer, or observed relationship. Criteria and evidence should remain inspectable, multidimensional, and proportionate to the question.
Editorial basis
This page explains product doctrine and boundaries. It does not demonstrate source coverage or observed outcomes.
Read the product modelExplore Knowledge
Explore AXIGNAL