Separate the original observation from its representation
A source may provide a page, file, statement or result under particular conditions. Later extraction selects or structures parts of that material. Keeping the reference, time and permitted excerpt where relevant helps another person understand what was actually observed. Normalized text is a useful representation, but it should not be confused with its source material or given broader scope.
Describe transformations precisely enough
Translation, format correction, entity extraction, classification and summarization are different steps. Recording which was applied, with which version and to what input makes errors reviewable and readings reproducible. A transformation can alter nuance, units, names or context. If a step is uncertain or automated, that uncertainty belongs in the interpretation history and should not disappear in polished wording.
Prevent several outputs from looking like several sources
One text may produce a translation, summary and field extraction. These are derivatives of the original material and share its lineage. Counting them as separate observations would inflate support and hide their common dependency. Deduplication should preserve the different representations needed for analysis while preventing one statement from gaining apparent corroboration just because it passed through several formats.
Keep a path from conclusion back to source
A defensible explanation connects an interpretation to observations that materially influenced it, the rules applied and relevant transformations. It also keeps contradictions and limits visible instead of selecting only favorable material. That path does not guarantee the source is correct or the inference is canonical; it makes the basis inspectable, reassessable when it changes and understandable at its current scope.
Conceptual example
Hypothetical: a page states a capability in French, a process produces a Spanish translation and a later reading classifies the text as a manufacturing description. The explanation should link the classification to the original text, identify the language transformation and preserve uncertainty. Translation and classification are not two independent confirmations of the capability.
Scope and limits
Provenance may be partial when a source permits retention of only a reference or fingerprint. Not every change is reversible, and a summary can omit relevant nuance. Lineage does not grant retention or reuse rights; rights, privacy, time and scope still govern each use. A complete path improves inspection but does not replace evidence admission.
Editorial basis
This page explains product doctrine and boundaries. It does not demonstrate source coverage or observed outcomes.
Read the product modelExplore the Knowledge library
Explore AXIGNAL